Right. Telling a guy to search for what he's looking for is completely unproductive. When someone can't even decipher a post that tells them THAT, why should MY time be wasted attempting to hold their hand through it?

I've already given out all of the information that I'm willing to share publicly. If people are unwilling to even do a simple search to find out relevant information regarding the topics that they wish to learn more about, why should anyone be helpful and/or even moderately insightful? The level of discourse in the TT has done nothing but...

There have been a number of arguments over the merits of the Kelly Criterion in sports betting in the Think Tank. However, there was this post in one of Ganch's threads that had always intrigued me...

[QUOTE]
the Kelly criterion as applied to sports betting would be better called the Kamikaze criterion. You can prove it for yourself, and here?s how:

Here?s what you?ll need, along with at least a half-hour of time:
1. A hand calculator
2. Two decks of ordinary playing cards
3. Lined paper
4. Pen or pencil
5. A ?Thank You? note to send me after you complete this exercise...[/QUOTE]

I'd be curious to know which ideas you conceptualized yourself. Didn't you just say you were working with some European statistician to develop an MLB RL conversion chart for your book and that you had never heard of logistic regression before? LOL.

I happen to agree with the vast majority of what Thremp has said here. It's very curious that you are so infatuated with what touts are doing in these markets. Certainly, those markets aren't efficient and what you're suggesting is that the steam from those touts (who are playing blindly into those markets at ANY...